Thursday, September 02, 2010
Login  |  Register
You are here :: Blogs
 
RV Industry Bloggers  
Other blogs  
Search Blogs  
Archives  
IDS
View_Blog  
Feb 26

Written by: Greg Gerber
2/26/2008 3:41 PM

In an article appearing in The Best of New Orleans, Becky Gillette was quoted as saying "People are literally being embalmed alive" as she described the living conditions in emergency shelters produced by the RV industry.

This environmentalist wacko is the president of the Mississippi Sierra Club. She is also the chairman of the Sierra Club's "formaldehyde campaign." And, in a press release issued by her May 16, 2006, she claims to have been one of the people who tested trailers in the Gulf Region to determine they indeed emitted unusually high levels of formaldehyde.

In that release, Gillette claims RV manufacturers put profit above people, and that nothing will work to eliminate formaldehyde from products these companies manufacture.

In an article she wrote that appeared on the front page of The Planet, Sierra Club's Activist Resource, Gillette boldly announces that she "stayed at home in Ocean Springs, Mississippi, for Hurricane Katrina."

Not only does that admission prove this woman lacks the intelligence to lead anything, it makes me wonder why she's able to garner the media attention she does. After all, smart people know to leave their homes when a major hurricane bears down on their neighborhoods.

Gillette has been referred to as "The Erin Brockovich of Formaldehyde" in an article where she is listed as a "freelance writer and photographer," which are code words for "I can't hold a full-time job." That same article proclaimed:

"Gillette convinced the Sierra Club's national office to give her the money to order dozens of test kits and have them analyzed. 'At the time, we thought there might be one brand of trailer that had high formaldehyde,' Gillette says. 'We had no idea how widespread it would be or how big it would become.'

"Formaldehyde soon took over Becky Gillette's life. She spent her days testing trailers and her nights talking on the phone with sick and worried trailer residents — all as an unpaid volunteer. 'I was waking up in the middle of night thinking about the people I had talked to that day about formaldehyde.'

"Gillette remains the Sierra Club's expert on formaldehyde, finally paid part time, just as the group has petitioned the EPA to adopt federal air standards for formaldehyde that mirror California's new limits."

So, the Sierra Club's paid "formaldehyde expert is a part-time freelance writer and photographer. So much for science. But even unpaid volunteers need to eat, which leads me to wonder where Gillette gets her money? A quick google of "Becky Gillette, freelance writer" brings up listings of dozens of stories written for environmental publications, many of which are non-profit associations themselves. She has tackled everything from factory pig farms to herbal remedies for the common cold to how aromatic products pollute indoor air.

Hell of an expert this freelance writer/photographer is, with broad expertise in multiple industries regarding multiple topics.

Every Sierra Club press release that Gillette has issued closes with this statement, "The Sierra Club's 750,000 members work together to protect communities and the planet. The Club is America's oldest, largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization. The Delta (Louisiana) chapter of the Sierra Club has more than 3,500 members and has been active in local conservation projects for more than 30 years.”

Therein lies the problem with the Sierra Club. In order to rope in unsuspecting contributors, they publicly claim to be a grassroots environmental organization actively involved in conservation projects. But, behind the scenes, they tap freelancer writers/photographers and dress them up as experts, then give them laptop computers and printers to churn out as many press releases as they care to issue in a day all for the purpose of destroying companies and seeking even more government intervention in the lives of people.

It’s the same modus operandi used by the Humane Society. They use cute pictures of puppies and kittens to convince gullible givers to help fund their mission of caring for abandoned pets. But, then they use that money to destroy the farming industry. I find it very ironic that Gillette has been writing articles advocating positions for the Sierra Club and the Humane Society.

An online article appearing at Counterpunch (which you can read by clicking here), suggested the Sierra Club received more than $100 million in anonymous donations in 2000 and 2001. The article was an indictment against the secrecy behind Sierra Club funding:

"When angry, reform-oriented, incumbent members of the Sierra Club Board of Directors asked executive director Carl Pope, who gave the money -- he wouldn't say. When it was suggested that law required him to share the information with his Board -- he couldn't remember. So they asked again -- and he wasn't telling," the article read.

"To the intense discomfort of many members, the Board of the Sierra Club was told to tell no one and to ask no questions. Most of the directors of the Sierra Club have no knowledge of who is giving this money or for what purposes, even though the vast sum represents a major portion of the organizational budget of the Club. The lack of information prevents the Board from fulfilling its fiduciary duty of proper oversight," it added.

The Sierra Club is a very dangerous group. Operating as a "non profit agency," it can skirt many mandatory reporting laws. Yet, it invests hundreds of millions of dollars given by people seeking to "protect the outdoors" into advocacy programs that actually destroy business and prevent people from using public lands for recreation.

You can read a recent Sierra Club charitable report prepared by the Better Business Bureau by clicking here. In it, you'll discover than the group enjoys income of $90 million a year, but spends $28 million to raise it. Of its $53.5 million in expenses, 65 percent of the money was spent "studying and influencing public policy."

Perhaps as Congress launches an investigation into the RV industry regarding the construction practices employed to create travel trailers, the legislative body can invest a few hours into determining who is actually providing the muscle behind Sierra Club.

Until then, I will extend the offer to Becky Gillette that I made several months ago. I will gladly spend a week in any FEMA trailer just to prove how safe these units really are.

Copyright ©2008 Greg Gerber

Tags:

6 comments so far...

Re: Sierra Club claims FEMA trailers are "embalming people alive." Give me a break.

Nice article Greg. One Note, When you spend a week in the Travel Trailer make sure it is a 90deg+ day. Its the Fumes from the formaldehyde that rise in heat that makes your eyes burn.

By Ray on   2/26/2008 1:43 PM

Re: Sierra Club claims FEMA trailers are "embalming people alive." Give me a break.

I was hoping more for something like 100 degrees and rain just to see for myself why these things can't be aired out by opening windows or turning on fans.

By Greg Gerber on   2/26/2008 1:54 PM

Re: Sierra Club claims FEMA trailers are "embalming people alive." Give me a break.

FYI, I am a retired environmental scientist and have worked around formaldehyde during much of my career and am aware of the health hazards of higher concentrations of formaldehyde. - Having said that, I was trying to find something in your blog regarding the actual health issue with regard to formaldehyde. Instead it seems to be solely an indictment of The Sierra Club and, in particular, Gilette. After a little searching around the net myself I can see that the issue was actually raised by Gillette back in 2006 as a writer for the Sierra Club - that there was, in fact, an issue of excessive levels of formalin in some of the trailers. So, it would seem that the CDC has now corroborated much of the concern and that levels in some of the trailers are excessive and NOT conducive to normal good health. The statement that residents of these trailers are actually being "embalmed" is obviously silly. But the fact that the trailers are bad for ones health is actually true based on existing knowledge on exposure limits. And the fact that the RV industry plans to meet the standards for formaldehyde that applies to housing in the future would seem to be an admission that improvements were in order. I thought it was commendable of the industry to do so - actually take the health of future customers into consideration rather than spend most of the effort trying to debunk the science. There is plenty of research on the potential health hazards of formaldehyde and I have personally experienced some of the discomforting symptoms. Just wanted to make a point on what I thought the subject of the blog would be. Perhaps your plans to live in one of the trailers for a week exemplifies your opinion on the risk of being exposed. I, for one, do not care to make that point. My father used to tell me that his second hand smoke could not hurt me. I didn't believe him then and I know not to believe him now.

By Kent Allen on   2/26/2008 2:51 PM

Re: Sierra Club claims FEMA trailers are "embalming people alive." Give me a break.

It's hard to disagree with actual test results, yet, "why" are there literally millions of RV's in use, and, these FEMA units are the only ones emitting a high concentration of formaldehyde? Many units are shipped to areas exhibiting high temps. like in Louisiana and I have never heard of any widespread problems like what we are hearing here. A closed-up new unit on a dealer's lot needs a chance to "air". If a new home is never aired, the fumes are temporairily strong. Has anyone opened the windows for a time on these units instead of just turning on the air cond. to see if that remedies the situation? The RV Industry doesn't need or deserve allegations like this. They provided a quick-response fix to a dire situation that no other industry to react too as quickly!! Sounds to me like "someone" or some agency is trying to bring notiarity to itself at the demise of others. As I understand it, these units were built to FEMA stds. and the companies that built them would never produce a consumer product knowingly harboring a health hazard.

By Mike Miller on   2/26/2008 3:18 PM

Re: Sierra Club claims FEMA trailers are "embalming people alive." Give me a break.

I actually looked into why the emissions would have been so high. It probably had something to do with the rush to manufacture and get the trailers out there - as well as the lack of ventilation and windows prevalent in most trailers sold to consumers. But there also were no real standards governing the RV industry as far as emissions in finished trailers. The emissions from source wood, though were changed by our government (to less stringent) based on "industry data/input" in 2004. Here are some excerpts I found on the web sometime back while researching:

Published on Friday, May 21, 2004; LA Times
WASHINGTON — “Pushing aside new scientific studies of possible health risks, the Environmental Protection Agency approved an air pollution regulation this year that could save the wood products industry hundreds of millions of dollars.
In doing so, the agency relied on a risk assessment generated by a chemical industry-funded think tank, and a novel legal approach recommended by a timber industry lawyer. The regulation was ushered through the agency by senior officials with previous ties to the timber and chemical industries.
The officials say they advocate a balanced approach to environmental regulation that weighs costs as well as benefits. Their critics say science and public health are losing out.
"This rulemaking veers radically from standard scientific and regulatory practices," said David Michaels, an epidemiologist who was assistant Energy secretary for environment, safety and health in the Clinton administration. Others say it may violate the Clean Air Act......”

There is much more to the article but it seems to support that standards for the emission levels from the plywood used were increased based on industry studies - not so much on health impacts. It's a dicey situation to establish emission standards for any potential air pollutant - but science has tended to err on the safe side until definitive information is available. That seems to have not been the case here. I might add – and someone can verify this if they choose to do so, that ply board that can not be sold in China because of formaldehyde emission levels, can be sold in the US where it’s use is permitted.

By Kent Allen on   2/26/2008 3:54 PM

Re: Sierra Club claims FEMA trailers are "embalming people alive." Give me a break.

Swordfish thinks everyone is missing the big picture here.

Let's all admit formaldahyde exists in everything from toothpaste to wood building products, and that the same emmisions exist in most all buildings but with proper continual ventilation, and more square footage, the overall levels are much lower. But that's not the main problem here.....

People are LIVING FULL TIME in these TEMPORARY relief units that were designed to provide minimal shelter during a rebuilding period. We are now over 2 1/2 years later and people are still LIVING FULL TIME in them. Now the S. Club makes them feel victimized because the shelter provided free of charge smells bad.....

You won't be able to count on anybody to manufacture relief housing after this. Get a bunch of tents lined up......

By Swordfish on   3/7/2008 9:43 AM

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment    Cancel  
Text/HTML  
Add to Technorati Favorites

I heart FeedBurner

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

MRVA Intro
 
Home | News | Blogs | Community | Podcasts | Videos | Photo Gallery | Contact Us | Subscribe | Advertise | Resources | Bookstore
Privacy Statement | Terms Of Use
 
Copyright 2008 by RV Industry News
 
powered by